A Carneades reconstruction of Popov v Hayashi

Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):37-56 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carneades is an open source argument mapping application and a programming library for building argumentation support tools. In this paper, Carneades’ support for argument reconstruction, evaluation and visualization is illustrated by modeling most of the factual and legal arguments in Popov v Hayashi

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):15-35.
Introduction to special issue on modelling Popov v. Hayashi.Katie Atkinson - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):1-14.
Atheism and Moral Responsibility.L. A. Popov - 1973 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):73-85.
Community and utopia: A transcendental deduction.Stefan Popov - 1990 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 16 (4):291-302.
Regress Argument Reconstruction.Jan Willem Wieland - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):489-503.
No reconstruction, no impenetrability (at least not much).Shimon Edelman - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):376-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-28

Downloads
58 (#205,910)

6 months
2 (#297,737)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Walton
Last affiliation: University of Windsor