Boscovich’s “philosophical meditations” in the history of contemporary thought

The content of Boscovich’s Theoria philosophiae naturalis was well-known to his contemporaries, but both scientists and philosophers chiefly discussed it during the 19th century. The observations that Boscovich presented in this text, and that he himself defined as “philosophicas metitationes”, soon showed their being a good programme for the forthcoming atomic physics, and contributed to get rid of the mechanistic paradigm in science. In this paper I’ll go back to some meaningful moments of the history of Boscovich’s reception in the era of contemporary philosophy, by referring to what authors such as Popper, Cassirer, Nietzsche and Fechner wrote about him. These thinkers, indeed, particularly stressed the importance of the Theoria in the history of Western thought, and showed that it can easily be evaluated beyond the plane of a pure scientific investigation.
Keywords Ruggiero Boscovich  Philosophy of Science  History of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Rudjer Boscovich Und Die Induktive Logik.Martin Carrier - 1985 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16 (2):201-212.
Roger Boscovich.José López García - 1992 - Theoria 7 (1/2/3):687-701.
Boscovich Contra Nietzsche.Robin Small - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (3):419-435.
Rational Reconstruction Reconsidered.Bence Nanay - 2010 - The Monist 93 (4):598-617.
Is the History of Science Relevant to the Philosophy of Science?Marga Vicedo - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:490 - 496.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
221 ( #18,147 of 2,197,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #97,207 of 2,197,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature