Dialogue 42 (1):3- (2003)

Geoffrey Gorham
Macalester College
In his recent survey of the “dialectic of creation” in seventeenth-century philosophy, Thomas Lennon has suggested that Descartes’s assumptions about causality encourage a kind of “pantheistic emanationism”. Lennon notes that Descartes regularly invokes the principle that there is nothing in the effect which was not previously present, either formally or eminently, in the cause. Descartes also believes that God is the continuous, total, and efficient cause of everything. From these assumptions it should follow that everything that exists in the created world is previously present in God. Indeed, Descartes embraces the emanationist doctrine explicitly when, at the end of his replies to the Second Set of Objections, he arranges the arguments of the Meditations in “geometrical fashion.” The demonstration of Proposition III includes a sub-proof of the proposition that “he who preserves me has within himself, either formally or eminently, whatever is in me”. Since God preserves the entire universe, it follows that everything is in him, either formally or eminently. While far from the radical Spinozistic view that God and the world are identical, the notion that everything in creation is also in God would seem to have its own unwelcome theological consequences, at least from a Cartesian point of view. In particular, it implies that extension, and hence divisibility, are in God. But, as Descartes himself cautions, “being divisible is an imperfection” and so completely foreign to God.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0012-2173
DOI 10.1017/s0012217300004182
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,508
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Philosophical Writings of Descartes.Rene Descartes - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.
Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy.Anthony Kenny (ed.) - 1968 - St. Augustine's Press.
Learning from six philosophers. Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, 2 vol.Jonathan Bennett - 2001 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 191 (4):517-518.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Newton’s Neo-Platonic Ontology of Space.Edward Slowik - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):419-448.
Backing Into Spinozism.Samuel Newlands - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (3):511-537.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Descartes' Dilemma.Robert Stoothoff - 1989 - Philosophical Quarterly 39 (156):294-307.
Descartes on God's Relation to Time.Geoffrey Gorham - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (4):413-431.
Descartes on Persistence and Temporal Parts.Geoffrey Gorham - 2010 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Harry Silverstein (eds.), Time and Identity. MIT Press.
Descartes on the Innateness of All Ideas.Geoffrey Gorham - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (3):355 - 388.
The Altruists' Dilemma.Colin Grant - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):315-328.
Semantics for Analytic Containment.Fabrice Correia - 2004 - Studia Logica 77 (1):87-104.
Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: The Fourth Distinction.Walter Ott - 2006 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (3):437 – 450.


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #203,663 of 2,330,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #587,623 of 2,330,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes