Denying to the Grave: Why We Ignore the Facts That Will Save Us

Oxford University Press USA (2016)

Abstract
Why do some parents refuse to vaccinate their children? Why do some people keep guns at home, despite scientific evidence of risk to their family members? And why do people use antibiotics for illnesses they cannot possibly alleviate? When it comes to health, many people insist that science is wrong, that the evidence is incomplete, and that unidentified hazards lurk everywhere. In Denying to the Grave, Gorman and Gorman, a father-daughter team, explore the psychology of health science denial. Using several examples of such denial as test cases, they propose six key principles that may lead individuals to reject "accepted" health-related wisdom: the charismatic leader; fear of complexity; confirmation bias and the internet; fear of corporate and government conspiracies; causality and filling the ignorance gap; and the nature of risk prediction. The authors argue that the health sciences are especially vulnerable to our innate resistance to integrate new concepts with pre-existing beliefs. This psychological difficulty of incorporating new information is on the cutting edge of neuroscience research, as scientists continue to identify brain responses to new information that reveal deep-seated, innate discomfort with changing our minds. Denying to the Grave explores risk theory and how people make decisions about what is best for them and their loved ones, in an effort to better understand how people think when faced with significant health decisions. This book points the way to a new and important understanding of how science should be conveyed to the public in order to save lives with existing knowledge and technology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book $13.64 used (51% off)   $19.99 new (29% off)   $27.00 from Amazon (4% off)   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9780199396603   0199396604   7521722183
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,088
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Priorities in the Israeli Health Care System.Frida Simonstein - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):341-347.
A Human Right to Health? Some Inconclusive Scepticism.Gopal Sreenivasan - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):239-265.
Denying Rumours.Jean-Bruno Renard - 2007 - Diogenes 54 (1):43-58.
Risk in Public Health and Clinical Work.M. Ortendahl - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (4):246-246.
Needs and Medicine.L. Duane Willard - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (3):259-274.
Justifiability to Each Person.Derek Parfit - 2003 - Ratio 16 (4):368–390.
Value Neutrality in Genetic Counseling: An Unattained Ideal.Christy A. Rentmeester - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):47-51.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-12

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes