Bioethics 28 (4):203-206 (2014)
In his article ‘Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts’ David Archard attempts to show that his argument from common-sense morality is more convincing than other competing arguments in the debate. I examine his main line of argumentation and eventually refute his main argument in my reply
|Keywords||common‐sense morality moral experts moral expertise moral philosophers|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Rethinking Moral Expertise.Nicky Priaulx, Martin Weinel & Anthony Wrigley - 2016 - Health Care Analysis 24 (4):393-406.
How Can One Be Both a Philosophical Ethicist and a Democrat?Malcolm Oswald - 2013 - Health Care Analysis (1):1-10.
Similar books and articles
Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts.David Archard - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):119-127.
Moral Intuitions: Are Philosophers Experts?Kevin Tobia, Wesley Buckwalter & Stephen Stich - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (5):629-638.
Xunzi on Moral Expertise.Justin Tiwald - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):275-293.
Expertise, Wisdom and Moral Philosophers: A Response to Gesang.Christopher Cowley - 2011 - Bioethics 26 (6):337-342.
Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers.Eric Schwitzgebel & Fiery Cushman - 2012 - Mind and Language 27 (2):135-153.
Are We Ready for an Ecological Morality?Ernest Partridge - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):175-190.
Is Moral Phenomenology Unified?Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2008 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (1):85-97.
Why Common Sense Morality is Not Collectively Self-Defeating.Piotr Bołtuć - 2007 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):19-39.
Added to index2012-09-20
Total downloads39 ( #126,590 of 2,143,547 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #227,098 of 2,143,547 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.