’No Poetry, No Reality:’ Schlegel, Wittgenstein, Fiction and Reality

In Dalia Nassar (ed.), The Relevance of Romanticism. pp. 163-185 (2014)

Authors
Keren Gorodeisky
Auburn University
Abstract
Friedrich Schlegel’s remarks about poetry and reality are notoriously baffling. They are often regarded as outlandish, or “poetically exaggerated” statements, since they are taken to suggest that there is no difference between poetry and reality or to express the view that there is no way out of linguistic and poetic constructions (Bowie). I take all these responses to be mistaken, and argue that Schlegel’s remarks are philosophical observations about a genuine confusion in theoretical approaches to the distinction between fiction and reality. The confusion at stake involves the assumption that this distinction is and must be fixed independently of the ordinary practices of using these terms to mean certain things in specific situations. And this assumption itself is grounded fundamentally in a confused picture about the way language works. I argue that this confused understanding of the distinction between fiction and reality is not an object of the past, but a picture that is still shaping a central strand in the contemporary debate in philosophical aesthetics about our emotional responses to fiction. And while I do not use Schlegel’s approach to argue against this contemporary view directly, I suggest that his philosophical method includes the resources for unraveling a central confusion in this contemporary debate.
Keywords German Romanticism  Wittgenstein  Fiction  Skepticism  Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Plea for Excuses.John Austin - 1956 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1--30.
A Plea for Excuses.J. L. Austin - 1964 - In V. C. Chappell (ed.), Ordinary Language: Essays in Philosophical Method. Dover Publications. pp. 1--30.
Austin at Criticism.Stanley Cavell - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (2):204-219.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Much Ado About Nonexistence: Fiction and Reference.Hatem Rushdy (ed.) - 2007 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Much Ado About Nonexistence: Fiction and Reference.Avrum Stroll - 2007 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Did Wittgenstein Write on Shakespeare?Joachim Schulte - 2013 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 2 (1):1-32.
Beyond Reality and Fiction.Siegfried J. Schmidt - 1996 - In Calin Andrei Mihailescu & Walid Hamarneh (eds.), Fiction Updated: Theories of Fictionality, Narratology, and Poetics. University of Toronto Press. pp. 91--104.
Wittgenstein's Romantic Inheritance.M. W. Rowe - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (269):327 - 351.
Friedrich Schlegel, Romanticism, and the Re‐Enchantment of Nature.Alison Stone - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):3 – 25.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-05-19

Total views
87 ( #103,497 of 2,309,316 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #45,147 of 2,309,316 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature