Schematizing without a Concept? Imagine that!

In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. pp. 59-70 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The aim of this paper is to elucidate what Kant describes as the "free lawfulness of the imagination" in judgments of beauty in aesthetic terms, as called for by the distinctive nature of beauty. I argue that the aesthetic activity of the imagination differs from the theoretical activity of the imagination, and that the difference between the two has an aesthetic ground in terms of the special form of beautiful objects and the special value of beauty. In contrast to the theoretical activity of the imagination, the aesthetic activity of the imagination must be free of concepts and laws but nonetheless lawful otherwise it would not be able to unify the forms of beautiful objects, to attribute necessity to them, and by so doing to be adequate to the value of those objects as beautiful objects. On that basis, I aim to show that Kant's theory is not committed to the absurd view that some scholars have attributed to him: the view that everything we judge must be judged to be beautiful.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Imagining experiences correctly.P. Joyce - 2003 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (3):361-370.
Schematizing De Morgan's argument.R. G. Wengert - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1):165-166.
Imagery and the Coherence of Imagination: A Critique of White.Nigel J. T. Thomas - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:95-127.
Visual geometry.James Hopkins - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (1):3-34.
Is Imagination Introspective?Kevin Reuter - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (1):31-38.
The great beetle debate: A study in imagining with names.Stacie Friend - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (2):183-211.
Narration in Motion.K. J. Thomson-Jones - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):33-43.
The Puzzle of Imaginative Failure.Stuart Brock - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (248):443-463.
Images, Supposing, and Imagining.Annis Flew - 1953 - Philosophy 28 (106):246 - 254.


Added to PP

182 (#71,196)

6 months
75 (#14,655)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keren Gorodeisky
Auburn University

Citations of this work

Cognitive Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Aesthetic ideas.Mojca Kuplen - 2019 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 56 (12):48-64.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant and the Claims of Taste.Paul Guyer - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant and the Claims of Taste.Eva Schaper - 1979 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 38 (2):198-200.

Add more references