Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (4):239-292 (1993)
The Pleadings Game is a normative formalization and computational model of civil pleading, founded in Roberty Alexy''s discourse theory of legal argumentation. The consequences of arguments and counterarguments are modelled using Geffner and Pearl''s nonmonotonic logic,conditional entailment. Discourse in focussed using the concepts of issue and relevance. Conflicts between arguments can be resolved by arguing about the validity and priority of rules, at any level. The computational model is fully implemented and has been tested using examples from Article Nine of the Uniform Commercial Code.
|Keywords||argumentation dialectics issue spotting mediation systems nonmonotonic logic pleading|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge.Nicholas Rescher - 1977 - State University of New York Press.
Question-Begging in Non-Cumulative Systems.J. D. Mackenzie - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):117 - 133.
Arguments and Cases: An Inevitable Intertwining. [REVIEW]David B. Skalak & Edwina L. Rissland - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):3-44.
Citations of this work BETA
Hard Cases: A Procedural Approach. [REVIEW]Jaap C. Hage, Ronald Leenes & Arno R. Lodder - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (2):113-167.
Rationales and Argument Moves.R. P. Loui & Jeff Norman - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (3):159-189.
A History of AI and Law in 50 Papers: 25 Years of the International Conference on AI and Law. [REVIEW]Trevor Bench-Capon, Michał Araszkiewicz, Kevin Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Daniele Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori, Jochen L. Leidner, David D. Lewis, Ronald P. Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton & Adam Z. Wyner - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (3):215-319.
A Model of Argumentation and its Application to Legal Reasoning.Kathleen Freeman & Arthur M. Farley - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):163-197.
Similar books and articles
Thomas F. Gordon, the Pleadings Game – an Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice.Arno R. Lodder - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):255-264.
The Roles of Stories in Applying Game Theory.Till Grüne‐Yanoff & Paul Schweinzer - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):131-146.
Modal Logic and Game Theory: Two Alternative Approaches.Giacomo Bonanno - 2002 - Risk Decision and Policy 7:309-324.
Game Logic is Strong Enough for Parity Games.Dietmar Berwanger - 2003 - Studia Logica 75 (2):205 - 219.
A Formal Model of Adjudication Dialogues.Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):305-328.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #265,996 of 2,153,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,153,861 )
How can I increase my downloads?