Why do we SLIP to the basic level? Computational constraints and their implementation

Psychological Review 108 (4):735-758 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Computation, Implementation, Cognition.Oron Shagrir - 2012 - Minds and Machines 22 (2):137-148.
Computational vs. causal complexity.Matthias Scheutz - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (4):543-566.
What It Is Like to Be a Quark.Pat Lewtas - 2013 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (9-10):9-10.
The Role of Natural Constraints in Computational Theories of Vision.Peter Alan Morton - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Against Structuralist Theories of Computational Implementation.Michael Rescorla - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):681-707.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
13 (#1,060,918)

6 months
5 (#703,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Features of similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.
The adaptive nature of human categorization.John R. Anderson - 1991 - Psychological Review 98 (3):409-429.
How shall a thing be called?Roger Brown - 1958 - Psychological Review 65 (1):14-21.

View all 6 references / Add more references