“But You Would Be the Best Mother”: Unwomen, Counterstories, and the Motherhood Mandate

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (2):327-347 (2016)

Anna Gotlib
Brooklyn College
This paper addresses and challenges the pronatalist marginalization and oppression of voluntarily childless women in the Global North. These conditions call for philosophical analyses and for sociopolitical responses that would make possible the necessary moral spaces for resistance. Focusing on the relatively privileged subgroups of women who are the targets of pronatalist campaigns, the paper explores the reasons behind their choices, the nature and methods of Western pronatalism, and distinguishes three specific sources of some of the more lasting, and stigmatizing attacks: popular culture, law and policy, and medicine itself. I then argue that because they are construed by motherhood-essentializing, and increasingly popular, pronatalist narratives as, among other things, “failed” or “selfish,” voluntarily childless women are subsequently burdened with damaged identities that can leave them personally othered and uniquely liminal in ways that are destructive to moral agency. Finally, I conclude with a challenge to the pronatalist master narratives by suggesting the possibility of counter narratives to the voluntarily childless woman's liminality that might serve as the ground of moral and political solidarity among differently situated women, regardless of their motherhood status.
Keywords Pronatalism  Voluntary childlessness  Narrative  Marginalization  Feminist moral theory  Moral agency
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-016-9699-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,474
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Child Is This?Hilde Lindemann Nelson - 2002 - Hastings Center Report 32 (6):29-38.
Intergenerational Justice and Health Care: A Case for Interdependence.Anna Gotlib - 2014 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7 (1):142.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Agency in Other Animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
On Cultural Narratives, Fertility Medicine and Women’s Agency.Frida Simonstein - 2008 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 18 (4):118-118.
Kant on Moral Agency and Women's Nature.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - Kantian Review 16 (1):89-111.
Kant's Moral Anti-Realism.Frederick Rauscher - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (4):477-499.
In Praise of Blame.Barbara Houston - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (4):128 - 147.


Added to PP index

Total views
24 ( #367,794 of 2,273,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #320,037 of 2,273,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature