Competing values: A respectful critique of narrative research

Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):191 – 194 (2001)
Abstract
Smythe and Murray (2000) presented the basic ethical issues in narrative research (NR) in a comprehensive, well-reasoned, and direct manner. In this critique, we highlight 3 issues. Two matters appear to challenge the internal inconsistency of the assumptions of NR: privileging some voices over others and a potential inherent conflict of interest for some researchers. We also examine some issues regarding the protection of research participants and conclude with modest recommendations.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/S15327019EB1102_6
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,651
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Respectful Reply to Gottlieb and Lasser.William E. Smythe & Maureen J. Murray - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):195 – 199.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

9 ( #447,496 of 2,143,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #386,855 of 2,143,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums