How Does an Aristotelian Substance Have its Platonic Properties? Issues and Options

Axiomathes 23 (2):343-364 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Attempts to explicate the substance-property nexus are legion in the philosophical literature both historical and contemporary. In this paper, I shall attempt to impose some structure into the discussion by exploring ways to combine two unlikely bedfellows—Platonic properties and Aristotelian substances. Special attention is paid to the logical structure of substances and the metaphysics of property exemplification. I shall argue that an Aristotelian-Platonic account of the substance-property nexus is possible and has been ably defended by contemporary philosophers

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Property Dualism and Substance Dualism.Penelope Mackie - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):181-199.
Property dualism without substance dualism?Robert Francescotti - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (2):93-116.
The Nature of Substance.Ian J. Thompson - 1988 - Cogito 2 (2):17-19.
Are Bolzano’s Substances Simple?Andrej Krause - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):543-562.
Should property-dualists be substance-hylomorphists?Gordon Barnes - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:285-299.
A note on analysing substancehood.David Denby - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):473 – 484.
The Problem of Substance in Metaphysics.Kanu Ikechukwu Anthony - 2012 - African Research Review 1 (1):24-29.
Matter in Z3.Boris Hennig - 2008 - Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):199-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
321 (#60,450)

6 months
17 (#142,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Created and Uncreated Things.Michelle Panchuk - 2016 - International Philosophical Quarterly 56 (1):99-112.
Are Bare Particulars Constituents?Richard Brian Davis - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (4):395-410.
21 In Defense of Christian Platonism.Paul M. Gould - 2024 - In Mirosław Szatkowski (ed.), Ontology of Divinity. De Gruyter. pp. 419-444.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On what grounds what.Jonathan Schaffer - 2009 - In David Manley, David J. Chalmers & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 347-383.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction.Michael J. Loux & Thomas M. Crisp - 1997 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Thomas M. Crisp.
"Bare particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.

View all 39 references / Add more references