“Legal Form and Legal Legitimacy: The IHRA Definition of Antisemitism as a Case Study in Censored Speech”

Law, Culture and the Humanities 1 (online first) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The challenge posed by legal indeterminacy to legal legitimacy has generally been considered from points of view internal to the law and its application. But what becomes of legal legitimacy when the legal status of a given norm is itself a matter of contestation? This article, the first extended scholarly treatment of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA)’s new definition of antisemitism, pursues this question by examining recent applications of the IHRA definition within the UK following its adoption by the British government in 2016. Instead of focusing on this definition’s substantive content, I show how the document reaches beyond its self-described status as a “non-legally binding working definition” and comes to function as what I call a quasi-law, in which capacity it exercises the de facto authority of the law, without having acquired legal legitimacy. Broadly, this work elucidates the role of speech codes in restricting freedom of expression within liberal states.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The politics of free speech.Scott D. Gerber - 2004 - Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (2):23-47.
Contemporary discourses on general definitions of antisemitism.Jonah Jehoshua Jürgen Bogle - 2022 - Nordisk judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies 33 (2):38-48.
International Experience of Legal Regulation of Freedom of Speech in the Global Information Society.Yuriy Onishchyk, Liudmyla L. Golovko, Vasyl I. Ostapiak, Oleksandra V. Belichenko & Yurii O. Ulianchenko - 2023 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 36 (3):1325-1339.
Chapter 6. legitimacy in international law: Substantive and communicative dimensions.Олександр ВИСОЦЬКИЙ - 2024 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (1):120-209.
What is so special about [free] speech?DouglasN Husak - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (1):1 - 15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-11

Downloads
12,441 (#267)

6 months
317 (#8,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rebecca Ruth Gould
School of Oriental and African Studies

References found in this work

Legal realism, critical legal studies, and Dworkin.Andrew Altman - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (3):205-235.

Add more references