Annals of Science 79 (2):164-214 (2022)
Abstract |
ABSTRACT In 1626, René Descartes and Claude Mydorge worked closely together on the problem of refraction, apparently discovering what is now known as the sine law of refraction. They constructed a plano-hyperbolic lens in order to test out the truth of this mathematical relationship. In 1637, Descartes finally published the sine method of determining refractions in his Dioptrique, which also demonstrated, on the basis of this relationship, that the hyperbola and ellipse were anaclastic lines without mentioning Mydorge. Mydorge himself wrote a short manuscript on the subject of refraction and lenses, which is found in a copy among Mersenne’s papers. Scholars have usually assumed that this treatise was written as Mydorge and Descartes worked together in 1626. However, other evidence shows that only the first part of the treatise records the two men’s early collaboration. Subsequently, Mydorge and Descartes completed their arguments separately, Descartes with the help of Isaac Beeckman.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/00033790.2022.2026479 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Latin Sexual Vocabulary.Amy Richlin & J. N. Adams - 1984 - American Journal of Philology 105 (4):491.
Physico-Mathematics and the Search for Causes in Descartes' Optics—1619–1637.John A. Schuster - 2012 - Synthese 185 (3):467-499.
Descartes: An Intellectual Biography by Stephen Gaukroger. [REVIEW]Steven Nadler - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (2):101-104.
Thomas Harriot’s Optics, Between Experiment and Imagination: The Case of Mr Bulkeley’s Glass.Robert Goulding - 2014 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 68 (2):137-178.
View all 11 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Descartes's Theory of Light and Refraction a Discourse on Method.A. Mark Smith - 1987 - Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
Once Snell Breaks Down: From Geometrical to Physical Optics in the Seventeenth Century.Fokko Jan Dijksterhuis - 2004 - Annals of Science 61 (2):165-185.
Physico-Mathematics and the Search for Causes in Descartes' Optics—1619–1637.John A. Schuster - 2012 - Synthese 185 (3):467-499.
The Development of Mersenne's Optics.Daniele Cozzoli - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (1):pp. 9-25.
The Cause of Refraction in Medieval Optics.David C. Lindberg - 1968 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (1):23-38.
Cartesian Optics and the Geometrization of Nature.Nancy L. Maull - 1978 - Review of Metaphysics 32 (2):253 - 273.
Hobbes’s Model of Refraction and Derivation of the Sine Law.Hao Dong - 2021 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 75 (3):323-348.
Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology. [REVIEW]J. M. P. - 1966 - Review of Metaphysics 19 (4):809-809.
Descartes' "Dioptrics" and Descartes' Optics.Jeffrey K. McDonough - forthcoming - In Larry Nolan (ed.), The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology.René Descartes - 1965 - Hackett Publishing Company.
Chymical Wonders of Light: J. Marcus Marci's Seventeenth-Century Bohemian Optics.Margaret Garber - 2005 - Early Science and Medicine 10 (4):478-509.
Using Invariances in Geometrical Diagrams: Della Porta, Kepler and Descartes on Refraction.Albrecht Heeffer - 2017 - In Yaakov Zik, Giora Hon & Arianna Borrelli (eds.), The Optics of Giambattista Della Porta : A Reassessment. Springer Verlag.
Binocular Vision and Image Location Before Kepler.Robert Goulding - 2018 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 72 (5):497-546.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-04-08
Total views
1 ( #1,545,750 of 2,506,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,511 )
2022-04-08
Total views
1 ( #1,545,750 of 2,506,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,511 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.