The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm : a critique of the adaptationist programme

In Francisco José Ayala & John C. Avise (eds.), Essential readings in evolutionary biology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Optimality in Biology.Daisie Radner & Michael Radner - 1998 - The Monist 81 (4):669-686.
San Marco and evolutionary biology.Alasdair I. Houston - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):215-230.
Seven types of adaptationism.Tim Lewens - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):161-182.
Was Hayek a panglossian evolutionary theorist? A Reply to Whitman.Andy Denis - 2002 - Constitutional Political Economy 13 (3):275-285.
Lack of evidentiary criteria for exaptations?James L. Dannemiller - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):512-513.
Supererogatory Spandrels.Claire Benn - 2017 - Etica and Politica / Ethics and Politics 19 (1):269-290.
Dennett' “Panglossian paradigm”.Alison Jolly - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):366-367.
Preparedness, phobias, and the Panglossian paradigm.Richard J. McNally - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):303-304.
Spandrels of truth.J. C. Beall - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-18

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references