Self-Defence among Innocent People

Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (2):127-146 (2005)

Abstract

I explain the asymmetry between innocent aggressors and their victims, and attempt to separate justified and unjustified defensive force when both parties are innocent. I propose the principle of initiating behaviour, which states that: ‘In order for one person to be justified in using defensive force the other party must initiate the apparently threatening behaviour, but the defendant’s interpretation of that behaviour, as being threatening, would have to be reasonable.’ We can thereby maintain the view that there is a significant relation between an act being justified and which party ought eventually to be given priority in a conflict situation. If we know that an act is justified, we know that we have to give preference to its agent when there is a choice between imposing equal harm on him or her and his or her victim

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#226,379)

6 months
2 (#257,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Killing the Innocent in Self-Defense.Michael Otsuka - 1994 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1):74-94.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Killing Civilians.Gerhard Overland - 2005 - European Journal of Philosophy 13 (3):345-363.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles