Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015)

Authors
Christopher Gowans
Fordham University
Abstract
Moral relativism is an important topic in metaethics. It is also widely discussed outside philosophy (for example, by political and religious leaders), and it is controversial among philosophers and nonphilosophers alike. This is perhaps not surprising in view of recent evidence that people's intuitions about moral relativism vary widely. Though many philosophers are quite critical of moral relativism, there are several contemporary philosophers who defend forms of it. These include such prominent figures as Gilbert Harman, Jesse J. Prinz, J. David Velleman and David B. Wong. The term ‘moral relativism’ is understood in a variety of ways. Most often it is associated with an empirical thesis that there are deep and widespread moral disagreements and a metaethical thesis that the truth or justification of moral judgments is not absolute, but relative to the moral standard of some person or group of persons. Sometimes ‘moral relativism’ is connected with a normative position about how we ought to think about or act towards those with whom we morally disagree, most commonly that we should tolerate them.
Keywords moral relativism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Moral Realism: A Defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - Oxford University Press.

View all 163 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How to Measure Moral Realism.Thomas Pölzler - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3):647-670.
Against Deep Conventionalism.Eric Moore - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 45 (3):228-240.
Improving Practical Reasoning and Argumentation.Michael D. Baumtrog - 2015 - Dissertation, Universidade Nova de Lisboa

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Kinds of Moral Relativism.John Tilley - 1995 - Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):187-192.
System Relativism.Charles Sayward - 1988 - Ratio 1 (2):163-175.
Modern Moral Relativism.Christian Miller - 2016 - In Todd Shackelford & Viviana Weekes-Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer.
An Approach to Relativism.Thomas L. Carson - 1999 - Teaching Philosophy 22 (2):161-184.
Moral Relativism.Qun Gong - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (6):29-43.
Some Varieties of Metaethical Relativism.Ragnar Francén Olinder - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (10):529-540.
Patient Moral Relativism in the Zhuangzi.Yong Huang - 2018 - Philosophia 46 (4):877-894.
Moral Relativism: Aspects and Principles.Mohammad Ali Shomali - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 11 (42):56-77.
Being a Realist About Relativism (in Ethics).Geoffrey Sayre-McCord - 1991 - Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2):155-176.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-03-10

Total views
102 ( #106,992 of 2,454,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #30,403 of 2,454,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes