Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):28-55 (2008)

Authors
Christopher Gowans
Fordham University
Abstract
The Neo-Aristotelian ethical naturalism of Philippa Foot and Rosalind Hursthouse purports to establish a naturalistic criterion for the virtues. Specifically, by developing a parallel between the natural ends of nonhuman animals and the natural ends of human beings, they argue that character traits are justified as virtues by the extent to which they promote and do not inhibit natural ends such as self-preservation, reproduction, and the well-being of one’s social group. I argue that the approach of Foot and Hursthouse cannot provide a basis for moral universalism, the widely-accepted idea that each human being has moral worth and thus deserves significant moral consideration. Foot and Hursthouse both depict a virtuous agent as implicitly acting in accord with moral universalism. However, with respect to charity, a virtue they both emphasize, their naturalistic criterion at best provides a warrant for a restricted form of charity that extends only to a limited number of persons. There is nothing in the natural ends of human beings, as Foot and Hursthouse understand these, that gives us a reason for having any concern for the well-being of human beings as such.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052508080023
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,956
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism and the Indeterminacy Objection.Scott Woodcock - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (1):20-41.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Virtue and Nature.Christopher W. Gowans - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):28-55.
Goodness and Moral Twin Earth.Christopher Freiman - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (2):445-460.
Animals in the Kingdom of Ends.Heather M. Kendrick - 2010 - Between the Species 13 (10):2.
Does Human Nature Conflict with Itself?: Human Form and the Harmony of the Virtues.Micah Lott - 2013 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):657-683.
A Theory of Environmental Virtue.Ronald Sandler - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (3):247-264.
Moral Agency and the Tenability of an Ethics of Virtue.Marcia Wendy Baron - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
A Theory of Environmental Virtue.Ronald Sandler - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (3):247-264.
Natural Goodness and Natural Evil.Joseph Millum - 2006 - Ratio 19 (2):199–213.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-17

Total views
14 ( #653,728 of 2,343,879 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #514,299 of 2,343,879 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes