Philosophical Studies 140 (1):65 - 82 (2008)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
David Lewis has offered a reply to the standard argument for the claim that the truth of determinism is incompatible with anyone’s being able to do otherwise than she in fact does. Helen Beebee has argued that Lewis’s compatibilist strategy is untenable. In this paper I show that one recent attempt to defend Lewis’s view against this argument fails and then go on to offer my own defense of Lewis’s view.
|
Keywords | Compatibilism Incompatibilism Free Will Ability |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1007/s11098-008-9226-0 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 10 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Explanatory Power of Local Miracle Compatibilism.Garrett Pendergraft - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):249-266.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Compatibilism, Common Sense, and Prepunishment.Matthew Talbert - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):325-335.
The Explanatory Power of Local Miracle Compatibilism.Garrett Pendergraft - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):249-266.
The Revisionist Turn: A Brief History of Recent Work on Free Will.Manuel Vargas - 2010 - In Jesus Aguilar, Andrei Buckareff & Keith Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave.
Defending Lewis’s Local Miracle Compatibilism.Shane Oakley - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):337-349.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
145 ( #81,876 of 2,519,571 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,550 of 2,519,571 )
2009-01-28
Total views
145 ( #81,876 of 2,519,571 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,550 of 2,519,571 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads