Philosophical Studies 148 (2):273-294 (2010)

Authors
Peter Graham
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Abstract
The Mind Argument is an argument for the incompatibility of indeterminism and anyone's having a choice about anything that happens. Peter van Inwagen rejects the Mind Argument not because he is able to point out the flaw in it, but because he accepts both that determinism is incompatible with anyone's having a choice about anything that happens and that it is possible for someone to have a choice about something that happens. In this paper I first diagnose and clear up a confusion in recent discussions of the Mind Argument and then go on to show why it is a bad argument
Keywords Free will  The Mind Argument  Consequence Argument  Determinism  Indeterminism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-008-9294-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Actions, Reasons, and Causes.Donald Davidson - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685.
Libertarian Accounts of Free Will.Randolph Clarke - 2003 - Oxford University Press USA.
Free Will Remains a Mystery.Peter van Inwagen - 2000 - Philosophical Perspectives 14:1-20.
Free Will, Praise and Blame.J. J. C. Smart - 1961 - Mind 70 (279):291-306.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Free Will Remains a Mystery.Seth Shabo - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):105-125.
Free Will and Mystery: Looking Past the Mind Argument.Seth Shabo - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):291-307.
Laws of Nature and Free Will.Pedro Merlussi - 2017 - Dissertation, Durham University

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Farewell to the Luck (and Mind) Argument.Christopher Evan Franklin - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):199-230.
The Fall of the Mind Argument and Some Lessons About Freedom.Donald Smith & E. J. Coffman - 2010 - In Oliver Joseph Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Action, Ethics and Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 127-147.
The Poverty of the Stimulus Argument.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
Defending Millianism.Peter J. Graham - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):555-561.
Konrad Lorenz and Contemporary Philosophy of Mind.Marco Salucci - 2004 - Annali Del Dipartimento di Filosofia 9:247-265.
Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Actors Are Not Like Zombies.E. Diaz-Leon - 2012 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):115-122.
The Argument From Analogy is Not an Argument for Other Mnds.Richard I. Sikora - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (2):137-41.
Free Will and Mystery: Looking Past the Mind Argument.Seth Shabo - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):291-307.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
125 ( #88,424 of 2,462,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes