- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Beyond “individuality” and “pluralism”: A review of ereshefsky'sunits of evolution: Essays on the nature of species [Book Review]
Biology and Philosophy 8 (4):457-468 (1993)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species.Marc Ereshefsky - 1992 - Journal of the History of Biology 25 (3):500-501.
Marc Ereshefsky, ed., The Units of Evolution. Essays on the Nature of Species Reviewed by.Suzanne Cunningham - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13 (6):304-306.
Marc Ereshefsky, ed., The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species Reviewed by.Pierre Blackburn - 1994 - Philosophy in Review 14 (2):92-94.
Reorienting the Debate on Biological Individuality: Politics and Practices: Review of Alison K. McConwell. Biological Individuality. Elements in the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 93pp. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108942775; ISBN: 9781009387422. [REVIEW]Rose Trappes - 2024 - Acta Biotheoretica 72 (1):4.
Introduction.Robert A. Wilson - 1999 - In Robert Andrew Wilson (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. MIT Press.
Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept.Brent D. Mishler & Robert N. Brandon - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (4):397-414.
Philosophical Dimensions of Individuality.Alan C. Love & Ingo Brigandt - 2017 - In Scott Lidgard & Lynn K. Nyhart (eds.), Biological Individuality: Integrating Scientific, Philosophical, and Historical Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 318-348.
Response to Commentary on the Individuality of Species.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (2):207.
Sex and the individuality of species: A response to Ghiselin. [REVIEW]Brent D. Mishler & Robert N. Brandon - 1989 - Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):77-79.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
32 (#645,101)
6 months
8 (#456,306)
2009-01-28
Downloads
32 (#645,101)
6 months
8 (#456,306)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept.Brent D. Mishler & Robert N. Brandon - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (4):397-414.
The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species.Marc Ereshefsky - 1992 - Journal of the History of Biology 25 (3):500-501.
Ghostly Whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the "Philosophers" on the Ontological Status of Species.Philip Kitcher - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (2):184.
Sets, species, and evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's "species".Elliott Sober - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (2):334-341.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6f97f49787-df84k uwo