Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):29-43 (2004)
Gould's Structure ofEvolutionary Theory argues that Darwinism hasundergone significant revision. Although Gouldsucceeds in showing that hierarchicalapproaches have expanded Darwinism, hiscritique of adaptationism is less successful. Gould claims that the ubiquity of developmentalconstraints and spandrels has forced biologiststo soften their commitment to adaptationism. Iargue that Gould overstates his conclusion; hisprincipal claims are compatible with at leastsome versions of adaptationism. Despite thisweakness, Gould's discussion of adaptationism –particularly his discussions of the exaptivepool and cross-level spandrels – shouldprovoke new work in evolutionary theory and thephilosophy of biology.
|Keywords||adaptationism constraint evolvability Gould|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Evolution and Constraints on Variation: Variant Specification and Range of Assessment.Trevor Pearce - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):739-751.
Why Don't Zebras Have Machine Guns Adaptation, Selection, and Constraints in Evolutionary Theory.Timothy Shanahan - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (1):135-146.
Why Don’T Zebras Have Machine Guns? Adaptation, Selection, and Constraints in Evolutionary Theory.Timothy Shanahan - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (1):135-146.
Radicals and Revolution.Mark E. Borrello - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 35 (1):209-216.
Radicals and Revolution.Mark E. Borrello - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (1):209-216.
Similar books and articles
Lack of Evidentiary Criteria for Exaptations?James L. Dannemiller - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):512-513.
The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: On Stephen Jay Gould's Monumental Masterpiece.Francisco J. Ayala - unknown
San Marco and Evolutionary Biology.Alasdair I. Houston - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):215-230.
The Tragedy of a Priori Selectionism: Dennett and Gould on Adaptationism. [REVIEW]Jeremy C. Ahouse - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):359-391.
Last Will and Testament: Stephen Jay Gould's the Structure of Evolutionary Theory.Kim Sterelny - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (2):255-263.
The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.S. J. Gould & R. C. Lewontin - 1994 - In E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. The Mit Press. Bradford Books. pp. 73-90.
Evolutionary Theory and the Social Uses of Biology.Philip Kitcher - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):1-15.
Methodological and Contextual Factors in the Dawkins/Gould Dispute Over Evolutionary Progress.T. Shanahan - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (1):127-151.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads119 ( #39,663 of 2,153,834 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,516 of 2,153,834 )
How can I increase my downloads?