Mind and Society 8 (1):59-76 (2009)
The European market has faced a series of recurrent food scares, e.g. mad cow disease, chicken flu, dioxin poisoning in chickens, salmons and recently also in pigs (Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera , 07/12/2008). These food scares have had, in the short term, major socio-economic consequences, eroding consumer confidence and decreasing the willingness to buy potentially risky food products. The research reported in this paper considered the role of commitment to a food product in the context of food scares, and in particular the effect of commitment on the purchasing intentions of consumers, on their attitude towards the product, and on their trust in the food supply chain. After the initial commitment had been obtained, a threat scenario evoking a risk associated with a specific food was presented, and a wider, related request was then made. Finally, a questionnaire tested the effects of commitment on the participantsâ attitude towards the product. The results showed that previous commitment can increase consumersâ behavioural intention to purchase and their attitude towards the food product, even in the presence of a potential hazard.
|Keywords||Food hazards Commitment Attitude Trust|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Measurement of Meaning.Charles Egerton Osgood - 1957 - London: Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
From Trust to Trustworthiness: Why Information is Not Enough in the Food Sector.Franck L. B. Meijboom, Tatjana Visak & Frans W. A. Brom - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):427-442.
Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate.Paul Weirich (ed.) - 2008 - Oup Usa.
Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap. [REVIEW]Iris Vermeir & Wim Verbeke - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (2):169-194.
Challenges for Food Security in Eritrea - a Descriptive and Qualitative Analysis.Ravinder Rena - unknown
The Paradox of E-Numbers: Ethical, Aesthetic, and Cultural Concerns in the Dutch Discourse on Food Additives. [REVIEW]Dirk Haen - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (1):27-42.
Does the World Need U.S. Farmers Even If Americans Don't?K. Hendrickson Mary, S. James Harvey & D. Heffernan William - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (4):311-328.
Food, Consumer Concerns, and Trust: Food Ethics for a Globalizing Market. [REVIEW]Frans W. A. Brom - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):127-139.
An Ethical Toolkit for Food Companies: Reflections on its Use. [REVIEW]M. Deblonde, R. de Graaff & F. Brom - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (1):99-118.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Use of Irradiation for Food Preservation.Paisan Loaharanu & Mainuddin Ahmed - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1):14-30.
One Ecosystem, One Food System: The Social and Ecological Context of Food Safety Strategies. [REVIEW]David Waltner-Toews - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1):49-59.
A Short History of Food Ethics.Hub Zwart - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):113-126.
A Mathematical Note on a Model of a Consumer-Food Relation in Which the Food is Continually Replaced.J. Reddingius - 1963 - Acta Biotheoretica 16 (3-4):183-198.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads8 ( #492,983 of 2,171,692 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,692 )
How can I increase my downloads?