Synthese 192 (2):487-503 (2015)

Authors
Abraham D. Graber Graber
Western Illinois University
Abstract
In this paper I will argue that there is a bi-directional relationship between philosophy and meaning such that doing philosophy can change the meaning of terms. A rhetorically powerful work of philosophy that garners widespread interest has the potential to change how people use a predicate. This gives rise to three concerns. First, one’s conclusion can become right in virtue of one doing a particularly good job arguing for it. Second, it may be implausible to take philosophy to be a primarily descriptive enterprise. Part of the job of the philosopher is to proselytize about the correct usage of a word. Lastly, and most worrisome of all, the age-old method of the dialectic, a centerpiece of the philosophical project for thousands of years, threatens to plunge a range of domains of philosophical discourse into incoherence
Keywords Meta-philosophy  Methodological artifact  Dialectic  Meaning
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-014-0580-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,775
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Realism: A Defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
The Emotional Construction of Morals.Jesse Prinz - 2007 - Oxford University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Methodological Framework for Comparative Engagement.Bo Mou - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:187-200.
History and Philosophy of Science Rapprochement: Shared Methodological Framework.Dominika A. Yaneva - 1995 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):143 - 152.
Individualism and Interpretation.Henry Jackman - 1998 - Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (1):31-38.
Adorno’s Negative Dialectic: Theme, Point, and Methodological Status.Nicholas Joll - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):233–53.
Deception.Leonard Linsky - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):157 – 169.
On Theory-Change and Meaning-Change.Michael E. Levin - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (3):407-424.
Methodological Naturalism Under Attack.Michael Ruse - 2005 - South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):44-60.
The Problem of a Final Theory in Physics.Igor Nevvazhay - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:145-150.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-11-12

Total views
74 ( #139,698 of 2,432,662 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #464,745 of 2,432,662 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes