Defending millianism

Mind 108 (431):555-561 (1999)
Abstract
Millianism is the view that all there is to the meaning of a name is its bearer. In a recent paper Bryan Frances seeks to undercut the traditional argument against Millianism as well as offer a new argument in favor of Millianism. I argue that both endeavors fail.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/108.431.555
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,169
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Recurrence.Nathan Salmon - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (3):407-441.
Gappy Propositions?Seyed N. Mousavian - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):125-157.
The Resilience of Illogical Belief.Nathan Salmon - 2006 - Noûs 40 (2):369–375.
The Price of Innocent Millianism.Stefano Predelli - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (3):335-356.
The One and Only Argument for Radical Millianism.Max Deutsch - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):427-445.
Beyond Millianism.Leo Iacono - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):423 - 436.
Defending the Defense.Bryan Frances - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):563-566.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
65 ( #83,047 of 2,191,848 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,848 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature