Journal of Business Ethics 45 (1-2):133 - 147 (2003)

J. J. Graafland
Tilburg University
This paper considers the distribution of responsibility for prevention of negative social or ecological effects of production and consumption. Responsibility is related to ability and ability depends on welfare. An increase in competition between Western companies depresses their profitability, but increases the welfare of Western consumers and,hence, their ability to acknowledge social values. Therefore, an increase in competition on consumer markets shifts the balance in responsibility from companies to consumers to prevent negative external effects from production and consumption patterns. An increase in competition on investor markets will shift the balance in an opposite direction.
Keywords ability  competition  corporate social responsibility  distribution  ethics  externalities  fairness
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1024188916195
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,172
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Meeting Goodpaster's Challenge: A Smithian Approach to Goodpaster's Paradox.David Gray & Peter Clarke - 2005 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 14 (2):119–126.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
41 ( #278,386 of 2,517,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #272,606 of 2,517,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes