Epistemic Evaluations: Consequences, Costs and Benefits

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (4):7-13 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rationally Maintaining a Worldview.Christopher Ranalli - 2020 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (9):1-14.
How to Destroy an Epistemic Game: Epistemic Triflers, Cheats and Spoilsports.Alfred Archer - 2024 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (8):12-19.
Critical Reply to'Culpability for Epistemic Injustice: Deontic or Aretetic'by Wayne Riggs.D. A. Coady - 2012 - Social Epistemology: Review and Reply Collective 1 (5):3-6.
Epistemic Entitlement.Peter Graham & Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (eds.) - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
I Don't Want to Change Your Mind: A Reply to Sherman.Natalia Washington - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.
Epistemic Norms and Self Defeat: A Reply to Littlejohn.Jonathan Matheson - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (2):26-32.
Developing Community Epistemic Capacities.Ian Werkheiser - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (2):97-101.
Four Asymmetries Between Moral and Epistemic Trustworthiness.Susann Wagenknecht - 2014 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3 (6):82-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-01

Downloads
573 (#48,812)

6 months
120 (#45,790)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Zachary Bachman
Sam Houston State University
Megan Henricks Stotts
McMaster University
Meredith L. McFadden
Lawrence University
1 more

Citations of this work

Epistemically blameworthy belief.Jessica Brown - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (12):3595-3614.
Why is Warrant Normative?Peter J. Graham - 2019 - Philosophical Issues 29 (1):110-128.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reverse Engineering Epistemic Evaluations.Sinan Dogramaci - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):513-530.
Alienation: The Concept and Its Reception. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 1991 - Review of Metaphysics 44 (3):651-653.

Add more references