Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):443-463 (2000)
One of the principal difficulties in assessing Science as aProcess (Hull 1988) is determining the relationship between the various elements of Hull's theory. In particular, it is hard to understand precisely how conceptual selection is related to Hull's account of the social dynamics of science. This essay aims to clarify the relation between these aspects of his theory by examining his discussion of the``demic structure'' of science. I conclude that the social account cando significant explanatory work independently of the selectionistaccount. Further, I maintain that Hull's treatment of the demicstructure of science points us toward an important set of issues insocial epistemology. If my reading of Science as a Process iscorrect, then most of Hull's critics (e.g., those who focus solelyon his account of conceptual selection) have ignored promisingaspects of his theory.
|Keywords||David Hull evolution selection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gould, Hull, and the Individuation of Scientific Theories.Paulo Abrantes & Charbel Niño El-Hani - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (4):295-313.
Similar books and articles
Epistemology, Necessity, and Evolution: A Critical Review of Michael Ruse's Philosophy After Darwin.Carlos Mariscal - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):449-457.
The Function of Credit in Hull's Evolutionary Model of Science.Noretta Koertge - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:237 - 244.
Is Science an Evolutionay Process? Evidence From Miscitation of the Scientific Literature.Kim J. Vicente - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (1):53-69.
Selection and Science: Critical Notice of David Hull's Science as a Process. [REVIEW]Alex Rosenberg - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):217-228.
Clark Hull, Robert Cummins, and Functional Analysis.Ron Amundson & Laurence D. Smith - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (December):657-666.
Epistemology or Not? An Inquiry Into David Hull's Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science.Kai Hahlweg - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (2):187-192.
Does Science Have a “Global Goal?”: A Critique of Hull's View of Conceptual Progress. [REVIEW]Todd Grantham - 1994 - Biology and Philosophy 9 (1):85-97.
Why Falsification is the Wrong Paradigm for Evolutionary Epistemology: An Analysis of Hull's Selection Theory.Eugenie Gatens-Robinson - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (4):535-557.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads89 ( #57,384 of 2,158,205 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #195,105 of 2,158,205 )
How can I increase my downloads?