Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 3:67-88 (2011)
Alvin Plantinga argues by counterexample that no naturalistic account of functions is possible--God is then the only source for natural functions. This paper replies to Plantinga's examples and arguments. Plantinga misunderstands naturalistic accounts. Plantinga's mistakes flow from his assimilation of functional notions in general to functions from intentional design in particular.
|Keywords||Alvin Plantinga Functions Intelligent Design|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Does Justification Aim at Truth?Peter J. Graham - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):51-72.
Similar books and articles
In Defence of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 715-731.
Steve Fuller and Intelligent Design.J. Shearmur - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):433-445.
Intelligent Design and the End of Science.Jeffrey Koperski - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588.
Consciousness: The Achilles Heel of Darwinism? Thank God, Not Quite.Nicholas Humphrey - 2006 - In John Brockman (ed.), Intelligent Thought: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement. Vintage.
Is Intelligent Design Creationism?Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus.
Should Intelligent Design Be Taught in Public School Science Classrooms?Anya Plutynski - 2010 - Science and Education 19 (6-8):779-795.
Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and Minds—a Reply to John Beaudoin.Elliott Sober - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):443-446.
Added to index2011-05-01
Total downloads235 ( #14,732 of 2,153,553 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #18,162 of 2,153,553 )
How can I increase my downloads?