Masculinity: Phallogocentrism and Performativity. A Philosophical Analysis Based on the Studies of Jacques Derrida, Judith Butler and Raewyn Connell to Counter Patriarchal Hegemony

Proceedings of the Global Conference on Women’s Studies 3 (1):1-16 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminist considerations have induced a rethinking of many aspects of our contemporary world, such as the concept of gender and power relations. This has led to a re-examination of the entire previous tradition of thought, finding in phallogocentrism the paradigm of reference. This term indicates, starting with Derrida's considerations, the Western tendency to have centred not only the logos, but also the phallus, weaving an intricate relationship between masculinity and language. It's precisely this bond that makes man the archetype on which society is founded, placing his supremacy in the natural order, defining power relations and nailing pre-established categories. A being-nailed in the Lévinasian sense, thus an adherence between the agreement of voices and being, which produces 'category-beings' in which pre-delineated social identity is concealed in a condition of 'nature', such as the 'being-male'. It's precisely this naturalness, discursively produced, that has made man universal. Consequently, man has convinced himself that he can speak for all humanity, becoming the logos through which he declines the rest. Declinations that have produced rigid and hierarchical categories that precede and define each person, prescribing 'consonant' ways, rhetorically assumed as 'human nature'. The "nature" of being man or woman does not, in fact, concern monolithic essentialisms, but rather movements of intertwined meanings in a process that Derrida defines as différance. A process, therefore, in becoming, which has over time produced unequal power relations, justifying them as "natural", and which daily reiterates a hegemonic and sexist social model. The aim of this analysis, hence, will be to bring phallogocentric masculinity and consequent hegemonic structures into the field of philosophical reflection, with the purpose of redirecting praxis towards performative processes of characterisation the person, rather than a pre-delineated categorisation. Thus, to release being from socio-cultural categories, which historical-performative praxis nails to each body.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Linguaggio e sessismo. La comunicazione "neutra" e gli stereotipi nei luoghi di lavoro.Alberto Grandi - 2024 - E|C Rivista Dell’Associazione Italiana di Studi Semiotici 41:526-537.
Patriarchal Machines and Masculine Embodiment.Ulf Mellström - 2002 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 27 (4):460-478.
Features of Dasein in Heidegger's Being and Time.Mahmoud Navali - 2024 - Journal of Philosophical Investigations 18 (49):43-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-03

Downloads
208 (#128,350)

6 months
208 (#18,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alberto Grandi
Università degli Studi di Bari

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations