Siegel on Competency Testing and Critical Thinking

Informal Logic 14 (2) (1992)

Harvey Siegel argues that minimum competency testing (MCT) is incompatible with strong sense critical thinking. His arguments are reviewed and contrasted with positions held by John E. McPeck and Michael Scriven. Siegel's arguments seem directed against the prevailing form of MCT. However, alternative formats which allow for the aggregate and context-sensitive nature of critical thinking are not doomed to the arbitrariness Siegel finds. MCT may be a legitimate and useful means for furthering critical thinking as one of our educational ideals
Keywords critical thinking, competency testing, education
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

McPeck's mistakes.Richard Paul - 1985 - Informal Logic 7 (1).
General Information.[author unknown] - 1971 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 1 (2):134-134.
General Information.[author unknown] - 1973 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 3 (2):140-140.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #244,851 of 2,309,226 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #161,802 of 2,309,226 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature