The normative failure of Fuller's social epistemology

Social Epistemology 16 (2):133 – 148 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the major themes of Steve Fuller's project of social epistemology is a reconciliation of the normative concerns of epistemologists with the empirical concerns of sociologists of knowledge. Fuller views social epistemologists as knowledge policy makers, who will provide direction for improvements in the cognitive division of labour. However, this paper argues that Fuller's conception of knowledge production and his approval of a panglossian approach to epistemology fail to provide the normative force he claims, and leave us unable to identify anything epistemic about our knowledge-seeking practices.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Policing knowledge: Disembodied policy for embodied knowledge.Joseph Rouse - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (3-4):353 – 364.
The bureaucratic turn: Weber contra Hempel in Fuller's social epistemology.Paul A. Roth - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (3-4):365 – 376.
The very idea of social epistemology: What prospects for a truly radical 'radically naturalized epistemology'?Steve Woolgar - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (3-4):377 – 389.
Can knowledge have a happy ending?Steve Fuller - 1998 - Social Epistemology 12 (1):89 – 94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#367,281)

6 months
1 (#450,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Heidi Grasswick
Middlebury College

Citations of this work

Not the best of all possible critiques.Steve Fuller - 2001 - Social Epistemology 16 (2):149 – 155.
Leaving dr pangloss behind.Heidi Grasswick - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (4):377 – 382.
Not the best of all possible critiques.Steve Fuller - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (2):149-155.

Add more citations