Philosophy 76 (2):191-209 (2001)

Abstract
I defend, in this paper, a version of a philosophy of common sense. I have use of some things from Reid's account of these matters, others from Wittgenstein's. Scepticism looms large—as do the questions of arguments for and examples of common sense. At least two different notions of common sense emerge, one of which has often been overlooked by philosophers
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0031819101000237
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,367
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Logical Knowledge.Ruth Weintraub - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (1):3 – 18.
Sociology and Common Sense.David Thomas - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):1 – 32.
Common-Sense and Scientific Psychology.Matthew Nudds - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):171-180.
In Search of Sense in Common Sense Management.Joseph Z. Nitecki - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (8):639 - 647.
Reid on Ridicule and Common Sense.Giovanni B. Grandi - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):71-90.
Reid's Defense of Common Sense.P. D. Magnus - 2008 - Philosophers' Imprint 8:1-14.
The Common Sense View of Sense-Perception.R. I. Aaron - 1958 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:1-14.
Common Sense.Michael De Medeiros - 2010 - Weigl Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
105 ( #91,187 of 2,362,029 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #88,445 of 2,362,029 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes