Utilitas 29 (2):175-213 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Harsanyi claimed that his Aggregation and Impartial Observer Theorems provide a justification for utilitarianism. This claim has been strongly resisted, notably by Sen and Weymark, who argue that while Harsanyi has perhaps shown that overall good is a linear sum of individuals’ von Neumann–Morgenstern utilities, he has done nothing to establish any connection between the notion of von Neumann–Morgenstern utility and that of well-being, and hence that utilitarianism does not follow.
The present article defends Harsanyi against the Sen–Weymark critique. I argue that, far from being a term with precise and independent quantitative content whose relationship to von Neumann–Morgenstern utility is then a substantive question, terms such as ‘well-being’ suffer (or suffered) from indeterminacy regarding precisely which quantity they refer to. If so, then (on the issue that this article focuses on) Harsanyi has gone as far towards defending ‘utilitarianism in the original sense’ as could coherently be asked.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/s0953820816000169 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
New Work for a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
View all 17 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen–Weymark Debate on Utilitarianism.Hilary Greaves - 2016 - Utilitas:1-39.
A Reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen Debate on Utilitarianism.John A. Weymark - 1991 - In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press. pp. 255.
Social Justice, Genomic Justice and the Veil of Ignorance: Harsanyi Meets Mendel.Samir Okasha - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (1):43-71.
Contractarian Ethics and Harsanyi’s Two Justifications of Utilitarianism.Michael Moehler - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (1):24-47.
A Welfarist Version of Harsanyi's Theorem.Claude D'Aspremont & Philippe Mongin - 2008 - In M. Salles and J. Weymark M. Fleurbaey (ed.), Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism. Cambridge University Press. pp. Ch. 11.
Individual Fairness in Harsanyi’s Utilitarianism: Operationalizing All-Inclusive Utility. [REVIEW]Stefan T. Trautmann - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (4):405-415.
Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism.M. Fleurbaey M. Salles and J. Weymark (ed.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Deriving Harsanyi’s Utilitarianism From De Finetti’s Book-Making Argument.Enrico Diecidue - 2006 - Theory and Decision 61 (4):363-371.
Linear Aggregation of SSB Utility Functionals.Arja H. Turunen-Red & John A. Weymark - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (3):281-294.
Harsanyi’s Critical Rule Utilitarianism.Richard J. Stefanik - 1981 - Theory and Decision 13 (1):71-80.
On the Harsanyi Payoff Vectors and Harsanyi Imputations.Jean Derks, Gerard van der Laan & Valery Vasil’ev - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (3):301-310.
Rule Utilitarianism, Equality, and Justice: JOHN C. HARSANYI.John C. Harsanyi - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):115-127.
Preference Aggregation After Harsanyi.Matthias Hild, Mathias Risse & Richard Jeffrey - 1998 - In Marc Fleurbaey, Maurice Salles & John A. Weymark (eds.), Justice, political liberalism, and utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 198-219.
An Examination and Critique of Harsanyi's Version of Utilitarianism.Reidar K. Lie - 1986 - Theory and Decision 21 (1):65-83.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-04-04
Total views
28 ( #371,338 of 2,411,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,256 of 2,411,744 )
2018-04-04
Total views
28 ( #371,338 of 2,411,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #346,256 of 2,411,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads