A Reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen–Weymark Debate on Utilitarianism

Utilitas:1-39 (2016)

Authors
Hilary Greaves
Oxford University
Abstract
Harsanyi claimed that his Aggregation and Impartial Observer Theorems provide a justification for utilitarianism. This claim has been strongly resisted, notably by Sen and Weymark, who argue that while Harsanyi has perhaps shown that overall good is a linear sum of individuals’ von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities, he has done nothing to establish any con- nection between the notion of von Neumann-Morgenstern utility and that of well-being, and hence that utilitarianism does not follow. The present article defends Harsanyi against the Sen-Weymark cri- tique. I argue that, far from being a term with precise and independent quantitative content whose relationship to von Neumann-Morgenstern utility is then a substantive question, terms such as ‘well-being’ suffer (or suffered) from indeterminacy regarding precisely which quantity they refer to. If so, then (on the issue that this article focuses on) Harsanyi has gone as far towards defending ‘utilitarianism in the original sense’ as could coherently be asked.
Keywords Harsanyi  Aggregation and Impartial Observer Theorems  von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820816000169
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

New Work for a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
On the Plurality of Worlds.William G. Lycan - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):42-47.
Vagueness, Truth and Logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Putnam’s Paradox.David K. Lewis - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):221 – 236.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Discounting Future Health.Hilary Greaves - forthcoming - In Emanuel Norheim (ed.), Global health priority-setting: Cost-effectiveness and beyond. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen Debate on Utilitarianism.John A. Weymark - 1991 - In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being. Cambridge University Press. pp. 255.
Harsanyi’s Critical Rule Utilitarianism.Richard J. Stefanik - 1981 - Theory and Decision 13 (1):71-80.
Preference Aggregation After Harsanyi.Matthias Hild, Mathias Risse & Richard Jeffrey - 1998 - In Marc Fleurbaey, Maurice Salles & John A. Weymark (eds.), Justice, political liberalism, and utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 198-219.
Rule Utilitarianism, Equality, and Justice: JOHN C. HARSANYI.John C. Harsanyi - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):115-127.
Problems with Act-Utilitarianism and with Malevolent Preferences.John C. Harsanyi - 1988 - In Douglas Seanor, N. Fotion & R. M. Hare (eds.), Hare and Critics: Essays on Moral Thinking. Oxford University Press. pp. 89--99.
Funciones de bienestar social no lineales: una réplica al profesor Sen.John C. Harsanyi - 1996 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 5 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-05

Total views
76 ( #115,280 of 2,286,169 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #39,728 of 2,286,169 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature