Beyond Resemblance

Philosophical Review 122 (2):215-287 (2013)

Abstract

What is it for a picture to depict a scene? The most orthodox philosophical theory of pictorial representation holds that depiction is grounded in resemblance. A picture represents a scene in virtue of being similar to that scene in certain ways. This essay presents evidence against this claim: curvilinear perspective is one common style of depiction in which successful pictorial representation depends as much on a picture's systematic differences with the scene depicted as on the similarities; it cannot be analyzed in terms of similarity alone. The same problem arises for many other kinds of depiction. The essay concludes that depiction in general is not grounded in resemblance but geometrical transformation.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-11

Downloads
652 (#12,788)

6 months
47 (#17,388)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gabriel Greenberg
University of California, Los Angeles

Citations of this work

What Is an Object File?E. J. Green & Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (3):665-699.
Depiction, Pictorial Experience, and Vision Science.Robert Briscoe - 2016 - Philosophical Topics 44 (2):43-81.
Semantics of Pictorial Space.Gabriel Greenberg - 2021 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):847-887.
The Language of Thought Hypothesis.Murat Aydede - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Pictures Have Propositional Content.Alex Grzankowski - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (1):151-163.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Resemblance, Restriction, and Content‐Bearing Features.John Dilworth - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):67–70.
Canny Resemblance.Catharine Abell - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (2):183-223.
Defining Depiction.Ben Blumson - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2):143-157.
Pictures and Properties.Ben Blumson - 2014 - In Resemblance and Representation. Open Book Publishers. pp. 179-198.
Depiction and Convention.Ben Blumson - 2008 - Dialectica 62 (3):335-348.
Understanding Resemblance in Depiction: What Can We Learn From Wittgenstein?Elisa Caldarola - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):239-253.
Pictures, Colour and Resemblance.Michael Newall - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):587–595.
Perspective, Convention and Compromise.Robert Hopkins - 2003 - In Heiko Hecht, Margaret Atherton & Robert Schwartz (eds.), Looking Into Pictures: an interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space. MIT Press. pp. 145-165.
Perceiving Pictures.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):461-480.
Structure, Intention and Representation.Göran Hermeren - 1977 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):89-106.
Inflected and Uninflected Perception of Pictures.Bence Nanay - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford University Press.
Pictorial Representation: When Cognitive Science Meets Aesthetics.Mark Rollins - 1999 - Philosophical Psychology 12 (4):387 – 413.