Changing Concepts of Darwinian Evolution

The Monist 64 (2):195-213 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evolutionary theory is a tempting field for non-biologists, partly, I suppose, because it seems to impinge on such large questions about human and/or animal nature, “the meaning of life” and such, and for philosophers because of its tantalizing conceptual structure. Darwinian evolutionary theory in particular—the orthodoxy of the present and recurrently the most prestigious theory on and off throughout the past century—Darwinian evolutionary theory seems both remarkably simple and persistent in its basic principles, and yet remarkably flexible, not to say ambiguous, in some of its fundamental concepts. Accuse it of determinism, it turns teleological, accuse it of basing a most improbable history on chance, it tells of selection’s creative powers, creative in the full sense, like a composer or a poet. But accuse it of anthropomorphism, it turns hard-nosed and deterministic or even “merely” statistical. What material could be better suited to what my colleagues in Leeds used to call “concept-cracking”?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cultural evolution is not equivalent to Darwinian evolution.Dwight W. Read - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):361-361.
Can Darwinian Inheritance Be Extended from Biology to Epistemology?Carla E. Kary - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:356 - 369.
Foresight in cultural evolution.Alex Mesoudi - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):243-255.
Darwinian impacts: an introduction to the Darwinian revolution.David Roger Oldroyd - 1980 - Kensington, Australia: New South Wales University Press.
Race and language in the Darwinian tradition (and what Darwin's language–species parallels have to do with it).Gregory Radick - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):359-370.
Getting Scientific with Religion:A Darwinian Solution... Or Not?Barak Morgan - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (3-4):192-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
45 (#311,164)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Darwinian synthesis: A critique of the rosenberg/williams argument.G. Van Balen - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (4):441-448.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references