Ethical Discourse on the Use of Genetically Modified Crops: A Review of Academic Publications in the Fields of Ecology and Environmental Ethics [Book Review]
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):265-293 (2012)
The use of genetically modified plants in agriculture (GM crops) is controversially discussed in academic publications. Important issues are whether the release of GM crops is beneficial or harmful for the environment and therefore acceptable, and whether the modification of plants is ethically permissible per se . This study provides a comprehensive overview of the moral reasoning on the use of GM crops expressed in academic publications from 1975 to 2008. Environmental ethical aspects in the publications were investigated. Overall, 113 articles from 15 ecology, environmental ethics, and multidisciplinary science journals were systematically reviewed. Three types of moral concerns were used to structure the normative statements, moral notions, and moral issues found in the articles: concerns addressing consequences of the use of GM crops, concerns addressing the act (the technique itself), and concerns addressing the virtues of an actor. Articles addressing consequences (84%) dealt with general ecological and risk concerns or discussed specific ecological issues about the use of GM crops. Articles addressing the act (57%) dealt with the value of naturalness, the value of biotic entities, and conceptual reductionism, whereas articles addressing the actor (43%) dealt with virtues related to the handling of risks and the application of GM crops. The results of this study may help to structure the academic debate and contribute to a better understanding of moral concerns that are associated with the key aspects of the ethical theories of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics
|Keywords||Gene technology Agriculture Consequentialism Deontology Virtue ethics Literature analysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics.Paul W. Taylor - 2011 - Princeton University Press.
Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics.Ronald L. Sandler - 2007 - Columbia University Press.
Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.Albert W. Musschenga - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):467 – 490.
The Role of the Concept of the Natural (Naturalness) in Organic Farming.Henk Verhoog, Mirjam Matze, Edith Lammerts van Bueren & Ton Baars - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (1):29-49.
Citations of this work BETA
Modern Biotechnology, Agriculture, and Ethics.Per Sandin & Payam Moula - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):803-806.
Psychological Drivers in the Adoption of Morally Controversial Innovations: The Moderating Role of Ethical Self‐Identity.Alessandro M. Peluso - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (3):252-263.
Similar books and articles
Risks Associated with Genetic Modification: – An Annotated Bibliography of Peer Reviewed Natural Science Publications. [REVIEW]Sean A. Weaver & Michael C. Morris - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):157-189.
GM Crops: Patently Wrong? [REVIEW]James Wilson - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (3):261-283.
Understanding the Scope of Farmer Perceptions of Risk: Considering Farmer Opinions on the Use of Genetically Modified (Gm) Crops as a Stakeholder Voice in Policy. [REVIEW]Nicholas P. Guehlstorf - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):541-558.
Commercialization of Perennial GE Crops: Looming Challenges for Regulatory Frameworks. [REVIEW]V. Bagavathiannan Muthukumar, Spök Armin & C. Van Acker Rene - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):227-242.
Well-Ordered Science.Matthew Lister - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):127-139.
Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate.Paul Weirich (ed.) - 2008 - Oup Usa.
Book Notes. [REVIEW]Alison Bailey, Jan M. Boxill, Emmett L. Bradbury, Maudemarie Clark, Samir J. Haddad & Colin M. Patrick - 2003 - Ethics 113 (4):923-928.
Ethical Considerations at the Various Stages in the Development, Production, and Consumption of GM Crops.Michael J. Reiss - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):179-190.
Exploring the Links Between Science, Risk, Uncertainty, and Ethics in Regulatory Controversies About Genetically Modified Crops.Susan Carr & Les Levidow - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):29-39.
A Quantitative Safety Assessment Model for Transgenic Protein Products Produced in Agricultural Crops.John A. Howard & Kirby C. Donnelly - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (6):545-558.
How Useful Are the Concepts of Familiarity, Biological Integrity, and Ecosystem Health for Evaluating Damages by GM Crops?Ulrich Heink, Robert Bartz & Ingo Kowarik - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (1):3-17.
The Transatlantic Rift in Genetically Modified Food Policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Added to index2011-08-12
Total downloads57 ( #92,540 of 2,172,819 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #30,792 of 2,172,819 )
How can I increase my downloads?