Extreme Intentionalism Modestly Modified

British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (2):197-201 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

1. On at least one usage of ‘mean’, performing an action that leads someone else to think that P, is not, on its own, sufficient for meaning that P. Nor is performing an action that is intended to get someone to think this. Instead one must make one’s intention overt. Grice’s way of developing this overtness requirement requires audience-directed intentions: for an agent, on this approach, to mean that P, she must perform a publicly accessible action with the intention of producing in an addressee the belief that P, while further intending that her addressee enter that state at least in part by recognition of her intention. 11 Different types of intended cognitive state and content correspond to different illocutionary forces. Thus an imperatival utterance might be made with the aim of producing an intention to do something; and one might mean P as a conjecture rather than as an assertion by intending to produce in an addressee not a belief but some less committal cognitive state such as tentative acceptance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intention and value.Joseph Raz - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (sup2):109-126.
Talking to Infants: A Gricean Perspective.Steffen Borge - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):423.
Only Imagine.Emily Caddick Bourne - 2019 - Analysis 79 (1):174-177.
Intending, Settling, and Relying.Facundo M. Alonso - 2017 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Volume 4. Oxford University Press. pp. 50-74.
Communication and shared information.Marija Jankovic - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (3):489-508.
Historical interpretation, intentionalism and philosophy of mind.Vivienne Brown - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):25-62.
A Causal Theory of Intending.Robert K. Shope - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:361-394.
What are intentions?Elisabeth Pacherie & Patrick Haggard - 2010 - In L. Nadel & W. Sinnott-Armstrong (eds.), Conscious Will and Responsibility. A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--84.
Intention and Motivational Strength.Hugh McCann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:571-583.
A Causal Theory of Intending.Robert K. Shope - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Research 15:361-394.
Intention and Motivational Strength.Hugh McCann - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:571-583.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-30

Downloads
42 (#370,986)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mitchell Green
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

From Signaling and Expression to Conversation and Fiction.Mitchell S. Green - 2019 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 96 (3):295-315.
Reply by Kathleen Stock.Kathleen Stock - 2019 - British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (2):219-225.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
Assertion and convention.Mitchell S. Green - 2020 - In Goldberg Sanford (ed.), Oxford Handbook on Assertion. Oxford University Press.
Imagery, expression, and metaphor.Mitchell Green - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (1):33--46.

Add more references