Exploring the Valuation of Corporate Social Responsibility—A Comparison of Research Methods

Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1):1-20 (2013)

Abstract
This paper argues the case that tests of how investors value corporate social performance (CSP) based upon realised stock market returns are liable to be weak tests if markets are efficient and firms change CSP policies infrequently. We provide a theoretical explanation of why this will be the case using examples to illustrate. Subsequently, we set out an alternative theoretical framework for the purposes of investigating whether markets place a positive, or a negative, valuation on CSP, and show why this is superior to tests based upon Tobin’s Q. Using US KLD data, we demonstrate that, as theorised, markets place a positive value on CSP that is not detected by conventional returns-based tests. Our conclusion is that researchers who are interested in the question of whether engagement with a corporate social responsibility agenda is a value-enhancing activity for a company (as argued by some stakeholder theorists) or value destructive (as argued by Friedman, The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, The New York Times Magazine, 1970), need to look beyond returns-based tests to answer the research question posed
Keywords Corporate social performance  Valuation methods
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1465-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,293
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility.Michael L. Barnett - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:287-292.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Advising the Practitioner.Carola Hillenbrand & Kevin Money - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:151-156.
Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship.Ronald Jeurissen - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):87-96.
Corporate Social Responsibility.Claes Ohlsson, Stefan Tengblad, Frank G. A. de Bakker, Frank den Hond & Marie-France Turcotte - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:160-165.
Corporate Philanthropy Research.Ann K. Buchholtz & Jill A. Brown - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:70-71.
The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility.Jacob Dahi Rendtorff - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:111-117.
Good Corporate Governance Initiative to Ensure Corporate Social Responsibility.Rama B. Rao - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:395-414.
Customer And Employee Beliefs About Corporate Responsibility.Carola Hillenbrand & Kevin Money - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:464-469.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-08-30

Total views
35 ( #245,770 of 2,270,963 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #420,316 of 2,270,963 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature