Exploring the Valuation of Corporate Social Responsibility—A Comparison of Research Methods

Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1):1-20 (2013)
Abstract
This paper argues the case that tests of how investors value corporate social performance (CSP) based upon realised stock market returns are liable to be weak tests if markets are efficient and firms change CSP policies infrequently. We provide a theoretical explanation of why this will be the case using examples to illustrate. Subsequently, we set out an alternative theoretical framework for the purposes of investigating whether markets place a positive, or a negative, valuation on CSP, and show why this is superior to tests based upon Tobin’s Q. Using US KLD data, we demonstrate that, as theorised, markets place a positive value on CSP that is not detected by conventional returns-based tests. Our conclusion is that researchers who are interested in the question of whether engagement with a corporate social responsibility agenda is a value-enhancing activity for a company (as argued by some stakeholder theorists) or value destructive (as argued by Friedman, The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, The New York Times Magazine, 1970), need to look beyond returns-based tests to answer the research question posed
Keywords Corporate social performance  Valuation methods
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1465-5
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,824
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility.Michael L. Barnett - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:287-292.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Advising the Practitioner.Carola Hillenbrand & Kevin Money - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:151-156.
Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship.Ronald Jeurissen - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):87-96.
Corporate Social Responsibility.Claes Ohlsson, Stefan Tengblad, Frank G. A. de Bakker, Frank den Hond & Marie-France Turcotte - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:160-165.
Corporate Philanthropy Research.Ann K. Buchholtz & Jill A. Brown - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:70-71.
The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility.Jacob Dahi Rendtorff - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:111-117.
Good Corporate Governance Initiative to Ensure Corporate Social Responsibility.Rama B. Rao - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:395-414.
Customer And Employee Beliefs About Corporate Responsibility.Carola Hillenbrand & Kevin Money - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:464-469.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-08-30

Total downloads

14 ( #336,849 of 2,178,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums