Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):185-202 (2007)
This paper examines Heidegger’s account of the proper relation between philosophy and theology, and Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s critique thereof. Part I outlines Heidegger’s proposal for this relationship in his lecture “Phenomenology and Theology,” where he suggests that philosophy might aid theology by means of ‘formal indication.’ In that context Heidegger never articulates what formal indication is, so Part II exposits this obscure notion by looking at its treatment in Heidegger’s early lecture courses, as well as its roots in Husserl. Part III presents Bonhoeffer’s theological response, which challenges Heidegger’s attempt to maintain a neutral ontology that remains unaffected by both sin and faith
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Phenomenology and Theology: Situating Heidegger's Philosophy of Religion.Matheson Russell - 2011 - Sophia 50 (4):641-655.
Heidegger and the Critique of the Understanding of Evil as Privatio Boni.Richard M. Capobianco - 1991 - Philosophy and Theology 5 (3):175-185.
Science and Religion in the Theology of Dietrich Bonhoeffer.Rodney D. Holder - 2009 - Zygon 44 (1):115-132.
“Ereignis” (Heidegger) or “La Clameur de l'Être” (Deleuze).Kristien Justaert - 2007 - Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):241-256.
Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl.Søren Overgaard - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
The Existential Sources of Phenomenology: Heidegger on Formal Indication.Matthew I. Burch - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):258-278.
Heidegger's Formal Indication: A Question of Method in Being and Time. [REVIEW]Ryan Streeter - 1997 - Man and World 30 (4):413-430.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #139,642 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?