Illocutions, implicata, and what a conversation requires

Pragmatics and Cognition 7 (1):65-92 (1999)
An approach is provided to the prediction and explanation of quantity implicata that, unlike the majority of approaches available, does not construe Quantity as requiring speakers to make the strongest claim that their evidence permits. Central to this treatment is an elaboration of the notion of what a conversation requires as appealed to in the Cooperative Principle and the Quantity maxim. What a conversation requires is construed as depending, at any given point, upon the aim of the conversation taking place, the conversational record, which includes such features as common ground and salience relations among objects, and any proffered illocution calling for a reply. In accounting for this third dimension a partial characterization is provided of the speech acts of assertion and interrogation in terms of their role in constraining the progress of the conversation in which they occur
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1075/pc.7.1.05gre
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,106
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Assertions Only?Ben Bronner - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):44-52.
Conversation and Common Ground.Mitchell Green - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (6):1587-1604.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

73 ( #72,201 of 2,171,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums