Law and Philosophy 30 (4):381-418 (2011)

Authors
Michael S. Green
College of William and Mary
Abstract
In this essay reviewing Brian Leiter’s recent book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, I focus on two positions that distinguish Leiter’s reading of the American legal realists from those offered in the past. The first is his claim that the realists thought the law is only locally indeterminate – primarily in cases that are appealed. The second is his claim that they did not offer a prediction theory of law, but were instead committed to a standard positivist theory. Leiter’s reading is vulnerable, because he fails to discuss in detail those passages from the realists that inspired past interpretations. My goal is to see how Leiter’s reading fares when these passages are considered. I argue that Leiter is right that the realists’ indeterminacy thesis has only a local scope. Those passages that appear to claim that the law is globally indeterminate actually address three other topics: judicial supremacy, judges’ roles as finders of fact, and the moral obligation to adjudicate as the law commands. With respect to the prediction theory, however, I conclude that Leiter’s position cannot be defended. Indeed the realists offered two “prediction” theories of law. According to the first, which is best described as a decision theory, the law concerning an event is whatever concrete judgment a court will issue when the event is litigated. According to the second, the law is reduced, not to concrete judgments, but to regularities of judicial (and other official) behavior in a jurisdiction. I end this essay with the suggestion that the realists’ advocacy of the second prediction theory indirectly vindicates Leiter’s reading of the realists as prescient jurisprudential naturalists.
Keywords Brian Leiter  Legal Realism  Legal Positivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-011-9097-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Purity of the Pure Theory.Joseph Raz - 1981 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 35 (138):441.
H. L. A. Hart.Joseph Raz - 1993 - Utilitas 5 (2):145.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

American Legal Realism.Brian Leiter - 2005 - In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-04-09

Total views
48 ( #227,354 of 2,462,461 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,367 of 2,462,461 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes