Ratio Juris 23 (1):22-40 (2010)
This paper centers upon the issue, within the project of analytic jurisprudence, of how to construe the status of the legal activities of a state when there is a disjuncture between a nation's formal legal commitments, such as those stated within a bill or charter of rights, and the way in which its officials actually engage in the practice of law, i.e., legislation and adjudication. Although there are two positions within contemporary legal theory which focus directly on this issue (Inclusive and Exclusive Legal Positivism), neither is able to offer an acceptable descriptive-explanatory account of the variety of legal activities at play within such situations. Thus, tensions between legal formality and practice, existent in many legal systems today, can be used to delineate a theoretical gap in regard to our understanding of law. This paper serves to acknowledge that point, and suggests a possible constructive solution to the positivists' descriptive-explanatory problem. Furthermore, in taking seriously the gap between the normative orientation of a legal system and its de facto practice, this paper also suggests other areas within analytic jurisprudence that might be meaningfully informed by that issue.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics.Joseph Raz - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Functions in Jurisprudential Methodology.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (5):447-456.
Similar books and articles
Analytical Jurisprudence and the Concept of Commercial Law.John Linarelli - 2009 - Penn State Law Review 114 (1):119-215.
Hartian Positivism and Normative Facts : How Facts Make Law II.Mark Greenberg - 2006 - In Scott Hershovitz (ed.), Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford University Press.
The Anarchist Official: A Problem for Legal Positivism.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2011 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36:89-112.
The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
Was Inclusive Legal Positivism Founded on a Mistake?Scott J. Shapiro - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (3):326-338.
Legal Positivism? What Are You Talking About? ('De Quel Positivisme Parlez-Vous?').Francois Chevrette & Hugo Cyr - unknown
Inclusive Legal Positivism, Legal Interpretation, and Value-Judgments.Vittorio Villa - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (1):110-127.
The Place of Legal Positivism in Contemporary Constitutional States.G. Pino - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):513-536.
Added to index2010-02-23
Total downloads58 ( #89,385 of 2,159,120 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #86,402 of 2,159,120 )
How can I increase my downloads?