Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):527-542 (1987)

Who blows the whistle — a loner or a well-liked team player? Which of them is more likely to lead a successful opposition to perceived organizational wrongdoing? The potential influence of co-worker pressures to conform on whistle-blowing activity or the likely effects of whistle-blowing on the group have not been addressed. This paper presents a preliminary model of whistle-blowing as an act of nonconformity. One implication is that the success of an opposition will depend on the characteristics of the whistle-blower and how the complaint is pursued. Specific hypotheses and general suggestions for future research and practice are offered
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00383744
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Informal Social Communication.Leon Festinger - 1950 - Psychological Review 57 (5):271-282.
Conformity, Status, and Idiosyncrasy Credit.E. P. Hollander - 1958 - Psychological Review 65 (2):117-127.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #244,172 of 2,499,037 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #419,059 of 2,499,037 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes