Roberts on Depletion: How Much Better Can We Do for Future People?

Utilitas 28 (1):108-118 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suppose that Depletion will reduce the well-being of future people. Many of us would like to say that Depletion is wrong because of the harm to future people. However, it can easily be made to seem that Depletion is actually harmless – this is the non-identity problem. I discuss a particularly ingenious attempt by Melinda Roberts to attribute a harm to Depletion. I will argue that the magnitude of Roberts's harm is off target by many orders of magnitude: it is just too tiny to explain the intuitive wrong of Depletion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Future Idea and Philosophical Understanding.Xiaoting Liu - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 24:37-43.
The identity and (legal) rights of future generations.Ori J. Herstein - 2009 - The George Washington Law Review 77:1173.
The Rights of Future People.Robert Elliot - 1989 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (2):159-170.
Ethics, Energy Policy, and Future Generations.Peter Wenz - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (3):195-209.
Choosing Future People: Reproductive Technologies and Identity.Mark Greene - 2009 - In Vardit Ravitsky, Autumn Fiester & Arthur L. Caplan (eds.), The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics. Springer Publishing Company. pp. 307-317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
82 (#206,042)

6 months
14 (#185,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Edward Greene
University of Delaware

Citations of this work

The nonidentity problem.Melinda Roberts - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
The paradox of future individuals.Gregory S. Kavka - 1982 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (2):93-112.
Harm to the unconceived.Michael D. Bayles - 1976 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (3):292-304.

Add more references