Philosophy Compass 5 (3):228-239 (2010)

Authors
Robert Gressis
California State University, Northridge
Abstract
Maxims play a crucial role in Kant's ethical philosophy, but there is significant disagreement about what maxims are. In this two-part essay, I survey eight different views of Kantian maxims, presenting their strengths and their weaknesses. In Part II: New Approaches, I look at three more recent views in somewhat greater detail than I do the five treatments canvassed in 'Recent Works on Kantian Maxims I: Established Approaches'. First, there is Richard McCarty's Interpretation, which holds that Kant's understanding of maxims can be illuminated by placing them in the context of the Wollfian tradition, according to which maxims are the major premises of practical syllogisms. The next subject Maria Schwartz, holds that careful attention to Kant's distinction between rules and maxims, as well as Kant's concept of happiness, allows us to make sense of almost all of Kant's remarks on maxims. It may be, however, that on Schwartz's view agents turn out to perform actions as opposed to thoughtlessly habitual behaviors much less often than is plausible. This leads to the final approach, exemplified by Jens Timmermann, which is that Kant understands maxims equivocally. I claim that something like Timmermann's approach is the only way to make sense of all of what Kant has to say on maxims.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00255.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Kant’s Ethical Thought.Allen W. Wood - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant's Theory of Freedom.Henry E. Allison - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant’s Ethical Thought. [REVIEW]Stephen Engstrom - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy 99 (3):149-152.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Do We Always Act on Maxims?Sven Nyholm - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (2):233-255.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Needs of Understanding: Kant on Empirical Laws and Regulative Ideals.James R. O'Shea - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):216 – 254.
Maxims in Kant's Practical Philosophy.Richard R. McCarty - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):65-83.
Principled and Unprincipled Maxims.David Forman - 2012 - Kant-Studien 103 (3):318-336.
Kant's Compass.Jordan Howard Sobel - 1997 - Erkenntnis 46 (3):365-392.
The Life and Maxims of Ske̳nde̳s.Claude Sumner - 1981 - Printed for the Ministry of Culture and Sports by Commercial Printing Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-03-16

Total views
110 ( #81,760 of 2,326,043 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #63,629 of 2,326,043 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes