In Colin Marshall (ed.), Comparative Metaethics: Neglected Perspectives on the Foundations of Morality. New York: Routledge. pp. 102-118 (2020)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Anne Conway rejects the view that creatures are essentially members of any natural kind more specific than the kind 'creature'. That is, she rejects essentialism about species membership. This chapter provides an analysis of one of Anne Conway's arguments against such essentialism, which (as I argue) is drawn from metaethical rather than metaphysical premises. In her view, if a creature's species or kind were inscribed in its essence, that essence would constitute a limit on the creature's potential to participate in the divine good. It is this consideration that ultimately leads her to reject essentialism about species membership. The chapter concludes with an examination of some of the metaethical consequences of Conway's view as well as a lesson it can teach us about ideal adviser accounts of the good.
|
| Keywords | Anne Conway Metaethics Early Modern Philosophy Seventeenth Century Philosophy Platonism Neoplatonism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher (Review).Eileen O'Neill - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):122-124.
Knowledge and Suffering in Early Modern Philosophy: G.W. Leibniz and Anne Conway.Christia Mercer - 2012 - In Sabrina Ebbersmeyer (ed.), Emotional Minds. De Gruyter. pp. 179.
Anne Viscountess Conway: A Seventeenth Century Rationalist.Jane Duran - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (1):64 - 79.
The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy.Anne Finch Conway - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Tr. Out of the Engl. [Of Anne Viscountess Conway] Into Lat. And Now Again Made Engl. By J.C. Repr. [REVIEW]Anne Conway & Jodocus Crull - 1692
Time, Space, and Process in Anne Conway.Emily Thomas - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (5):990-1010.
Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy.Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (eds.) - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Gotteslehre Und Christologie in Anne Conway's "Principia Philosophiae": Frühchristlich-Patristische Einflüsse Und Merkmale.Josef Lossl - 2012 - In .
The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684.Marjorie Hope Nicolson (ed.) - 1992 - Clarendon Press.
Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World.Marcy P. Lascano - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (4):327-336.
Conway’s Ontological Objection to Cartesian Dualism.John R. T. Grey - 2017 - Philosophers' Imprint 17:1-19.
Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century, And: Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher (Review).Jane Duran - 2007 - Philosophy and Literature 31 (1):200-204.
Enchiridion Ethicum Præipua Moralis Philosophiærudimenta Complectens, Illustrata Utplurimum Veterum Monumentis, & Ad Probitatem Vitæperpetuò Accommodata.Henry More, Anne Conway, James Flesher & William Morden - 1668 - Excudebat J. Flesher, Venale Autem Habetur Apud Guilielmum Morden Bibliopolam Cantabrigiensem.
Enchiridion Ethicum Præipua Moralis Philosophiærudimenta Complectens, Illustrata Ut Plurimum Veterum Monumentis, & Ad Probitatem Vitæperpetuò Accomodata.Henry More, Anne Conway, Joannes Paulius & William Graves - 1668 - Apud Joannem Paullium. Prostant Venales Apud Guil. Graves Bibliop. Cantab.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-09-22
Total views
382 ( #20,813 of 2,427,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #15,784 of 2,427,680 )
2018-09-22
Total views
382 ( #20,813 of 2,427,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #15,784 of 2,427,680 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
