- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Towards mining scientific discourse using argumentation schemes
Argument and Computation 9 (2):121-135 (2018)
Abstract
The dominant approach to argument mining has been to treat it as a machine learning problem based upon superficial text features, and to treat the relationships between arguments as either support...Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Argumentation schemes: From genetics to international relations to environmental science policy to AI ethics.Fabrizio Macagno - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):397-416.
Argumentation schemes: From genetics to international relations to environmental science policy to AI ethics.Nancy L. Green - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):397-416.
Deploying Machine Learning Classifiers for Argumentative Relations “in the Wild”.Francesca Toni & Oana Cocarascu - 2019 - In Bart Garssen & Frans van Eemeren, From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 269-285.
Argumentation mining: How can a machine acquire common sense and world knowledge?Marie-Francine Moens - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (1):1-14.
A classification system for argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2016 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):219-245.
Mining Arguments From 19th Century Philosophical Texts Using Topic Based Modelling.John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Simon McAlister, Andrew Ravenscroft, Colin Allen & David Bourget - 2014 - In Nancy Green, Kevin Ashley, Diane Litman, Chris Reed & Vern Walker, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining. Baltimore, USA: pp. 79-87.
A classification system for argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):219-245.
Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):289-310.
Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining.John Lawrence, Jacky Visser & Chris Reed - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):289-310.
Argumentation mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-07-25
Downloads
51 (#474,600)
6 months
14 (#232,717)
2018-07-25
Downloads
51 (#474,600)
6 months
14 (#232,717)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter.Fabrizio Macagno - 2022 - Journal of Pragmatics 191:67-82.
Argumentation schemes: From genetics to international relations to environmental science policy to AI ethics.Fabrizio Macagno - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):397-416.
Recognizing rhetoric in science policy arguments.Nancy L. Green - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (3):257-268.
Argumentation schemes in AI: A literature review. Introduction to the special issue.Fabrizio Macagno - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):287-302.
The use of antithesis and other contrastive relations in argumentation.Nancy L. Green - 2023 - Argument and Computation 14 (1):1-16.
References found in this work
Argumentation mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.
Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure Theory.Nancy L. Green - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):181-196.
Processing natural language arguments with the platform.Patrick Saint-Dizier - 2012 - Argument and Computation 3 (1):49 - 82.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo