The social effects of advances in neuroscience: legal problems, legal perspectives

In Judy Illes (ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy. Oxford University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The social effects of advances in neuroscience: legal problems, legal perspectives.Henry Greely - 2005 - In Judy Illes (ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, J Illes (Ed). Oxford University Press: Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Legal Translation Versus Legal Interpretation. A Legal-Theoretical Perspective.Mateusz Zeifert & Zygmunt Tobor - 2021 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (5):1671-1687.
Ambivalences in Consumer Law: Remarks on the Effects of Writing the Law.Vincent Forray - 2013 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 20 (3):971-1003.
The Legal Mind: A New Introduction to Legal Epistemology.Bartosz Brożek - 2019 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Normative and Legal Regime of Legal Services Quality.V. A. Belov - 2017 - Дискурс 4:62-67.
AI and the conquest of complexity in law.L. Wolfgang Bibel - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (3):159-180.
Law, Institution and Legal Politics. Fundamental Problems of Legal Theory and Social Philosophy.O. Weinberger - 1992 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 54 (3):577-577.
Legal Security from the Point of View of the Philosophy of Law.Gregorio Peces-Barba Martínez - 1995 - Ratio Juris 8 (2):127-141.
Neuroscience, Ethics and Legal Responsibility: The Problem of the Insanity Defense: Commentary on “The Ethics of Neuroscience and the Neuroscience of Ethics: A Phenomenological–Existential Approach”.Steven R. Smith - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):475-481.
What will be the limits of neuroscience-based mindreading in the law.E. R. Murphy & H. T. Greely - 2011 - In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 635--653.
Justice, Property and the Environment: Social and Legal Perspectives.Tim Hayward (ed.) - 2020 - Routledge.
A human right to legal aid.Simon Rice -
Social justice and legal justice.Wojciech Sadurski - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.
DiaLaw. On legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 1999 - Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Neuroethics: the institutionalization of ethics in neuroscience.Amer Cavalheiro Hamdan - 2017 - Revista Bioética 25 (2):275-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Neutrality, Enhancement Technology, and the Regulatory State.Bradley W. Moore - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):64-66.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references